Method of detecting and outputting radiation dose rate information

ABSTRACT

A method includes detecting on an ongoing basis the currently existing dose rates while a worker is performing a maintenance or other operation within the RCA, and visually outputting information that pertains to the ionizing radiation to which the worker is being exposed during the operation. The information that is visually output can include information such as the current dose rate and the overall dose to which the worker has been subjected, but can additionally include information such as the time remaining before which the worker will have been exposed to the maximum allowable dose. Furthermore, it is possible for the visual display to output visual indicia that represent a comparison the exposure to ionizing radiation that had been planned as a function of time prior to the operation being commenced with the actual exposure to ionizing radiation as the operation is performed.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The instant application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/115,939 filed Feb. 13, 2015, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

1. Field

The disclosed and claimed concept relates generally to nuclear equipment and, more particularly, to a method of detecting and visually outputting information regarding nuclear dosage rates and/or other relevant information pertaining to the rate of nuclear radiation exposure during an operation within a nuclear environment.

2. Related Art

As is generally understood in the relevant art, operations such as maintenance operations, repair operations, and the like are necessary or desirable to be performed in a Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA). As is likewise understood in the relevant art, RCAs exist in nuclear power plant facilities, such as within the nuclear containment of such facilities, and in other places. Many such maintenance and other such operations within an RCA must be carried out by human personnel such as plant workers and the like. In such a situation, the worker who is situated inside the RCA is subjected to nuclear radiation, which is generally undesirable, so the worker typically is limited to at most only a certain predetermined amount of nuclear radiation, which is often measured in millirems.

In order to ascertain the number of millirems to which a worker is exposed during an operation within an RCA, it has been known to dispatch a number of personnel to the RCA for the purpose of measuring the various radiation dose rates at the various locations within an RCA where a worker may be expected to go. Such position-based dose rates, i.e., in millirems per hour, are then employed by planning personnel at the facility to plan the maintenance and other operations that are intended to occur within the RCA. The planning personnel consider the various dose rates at the various locations in the RCA and the amount of time that is anticipated for the worker to spend at various locations within the RCA. An estimated dose is estimated based upon the various dose rates that the worker will likely experience over the course of the operation. Various safety factors are built into the calculation in order to ensure that the radiation to which the worker is exposed does not exceed the maximum allowable dose.

While systems of this type have been generally effective for their intended purposes, they have not been without limitation. For instance, the safety factors that are built into the plans for performing the various operations are typically in the form of additional time, whereby the worker typically is removed from the RCA after a limited amount of time in order to ensure that the worker has not been subjected to more than the allowable dose of radiation. This is regardless of whether the maximum allowable dose has actually been received by the worker, and it increases the cost of performing maintenance and other activities in the RCA. Additionally, such planned operations are based only upon the data that was collected prior to the maintenance operation actually being performed, and it is therefore possible that the worker can be overexposed to radiation in excess of the maximum allowable dose despite the safety factors and precautions that are built into the operation. Overexposure of a worker to radiation is extremely costly and it is desirably avoided. Improvements thus would be desirable.

SUMMARY

An improved method in accordance with the disclosed and claimed concept includes detecting on an ongoing basis the currently existing dose rates while a worker is performing a maintenance or other operation within the RCA, and visually outputting to the worker or to another person such as a supervisor information that pertains to the ionizing radiation to which the worker is being exposed during the operation. The information that is visually output can include information such as the current dose rate and the overall dose to which the worker has been subjected, but can additionally include information such as the time remaining before which the worker will have been exposed to the maximum allowable dose. Furthermore, it is possible for the visual display to output visual indicia that represent a comparison the exposure to ionizing radiation that had been planned as a function of time prior to the operation being commenced with the actual exposure to ionizing radiation as the operation is performed. The various visual outputs can be visually depicted on a display that is worn by the worker during the operation and that is situated in proximity to the worker's eye, such as by projecting the visual information onto a lens of a set of glasses worn by the worker. Additionally or alternatively, the same information can be output on a visual display that is observed by a person outside the RCA, such as a supervisor. Additionally, the position of the worker within the RCA, such as in the form of x,y coordinates or x,y,z coordinates within the RCA, can be stored in conjunction with the measured dose rate at such location as detected by a dosimeter worn by the worker, potentially also with a time stamp. These data can be recorded in a database. The data in the database can then be employed to generate a dosage rate map of the RCA that shows the various dose rates at various locations within the RCA and that can be visually output for viewing by the worker, such as on the aforementioned set of glasses, and can additionally or alternatively be output for viewing by a supervisor or other personnel outside the RCA.

Accordingly, an aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide an improved method of visually outputting indicia that include information pertaining to the actual dose of ionizing radiation to which the worker has been exposed and that is updated on a continual basis.

Another aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide visible output that includes indicia that are representative of the time remaining before a worker will be exposed to a maximum allowable dose and that can include other indicia that are representative of a comparison between a planned exposure to ionizing radiation compared with an actual exposure to ionizing radiation.

Another aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to visually output a dosage rate map that depicts the various dosage rates of various locations within an RCA for viewing by a worker performing an operation and/or by another person situated outside the RCA.

Another aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide to a worker visual information pertaining to an operation that is being performed by the worker and to visually depict such information on a visual display device that is worn by the worker and that is disposed proximate the worker's eye.

Accordingly, an aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide an improved method of providing to a worker during an operation wherein the worker is situated within a Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) continually updated information pertaining to the operation, the method can be generally stated as including detecting a number of measured dose rates at a number of times during the operation, each measured dose rate of the number of measured dose rates being representative of a rate at which the worker is exposed to ionizing radiation at a corresponding time of the number of times, periodically determining, based at least in part upon the number of measured dose rates, a measured accumulated dose at each time of the number of times that is representative of the accumulated exposure of the worker to ionizing radiation since the beginning of the operation, for each time of the number of times: subtracting the corresponding measured accumulated dose from an allowable maximum dose to determine a corresponding actual available dose that is representative of a corresponding additional accumulation of exposure of the worker to ionizing radiation that is permissible during the operation, and determining, based at least in part upon the corresponding actual available dose and a measured dose rate from among the number of measured dose rates, a corresponding actual time remaining until the worker will have been exposed to the allowable maximum dose, and outputting at one or more times of the number of times on a visual display a visible output that includes indicia which is representative, at least in part, of the actual time remaining.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A further understanding of the disclosed and claimed concept can be gained from the following Description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a system that is usable to perform an improved method in accordance with the disclosed and claimed concept;

FIG. 2 is a processing diagram depicting certain aspects of the improved method;

FIG. 3 is an exemplary chart depicting various calculated results and visual outputs that occur during the improved method; and

FIG. 4 is a diagram depicting the development of a set of dose rate and position data that is usable to create a dosage rate map such as is depicted in FIG. 1.

Similar numerals refer to similar parts throughout the specification.

DESCRIPTION

An improved system 4 in accordance with the disclosed and claimed concept is depicted generally in FIG. 1. The system 4 is usable in connection with a radiologically controlled area (RCA) 8 that may be situated within a nuclear containment of a nuclear power plant, by way of example and without limitation. The system 4 includes a computer 12 having a visual display 16 and which is in wireless communication with a set of glasses 20 that can be worn by a worker 28 as well as with a tablet 24 that can be carried by the worker 28. The worker 28 additionally carries a portable electronic dosimeter 32 which can include a Geiger counter or other such device that measures the dosage rate of ionizing radiation to which it is subjected.

In the depicted exemplary embodiment, the dosimeter 32 is in wireless communication with the tablet 24 and/or with the glasses 20 and/or with the computer 12. That is, the glasses 20, the tablet 24, and the dosimeter 32 can wirelessly communicate with one another via a Bluetooth wireless connection or other wireless connection. The glasses 20, the table 24, and, potentially, the dosimeter 32 can communicate wirelessly with the computer 12 via a number of wireless access points 36 that are in electronic communication with the computer 12. As employed herein, the expression “a number of” and variations thereof shall broadly to any non-zero quantity, including a quantity of one. The number of wireless access points 36 will be situated within the RCA 8 and are configured to not only receive the wireless signals that are being transmitted from the glasses 20, the tablet 24, and the dosimeter 32, but to also communicate wireless signals to such devices. Additionally, the number of wireless access points 36 are able to detect the specific location within the RCA 8 of, for instance, the dosimeter 32 and/or the table 24 and/or the glasses 20 at any given time. See the following link regarding Cisco's Wi Fi-Based Location Analytics:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/mobility-services-engine/white_paper_c11-728970.html

For instance, the dosimeter 32 regularly measures the dosage rate of ionizing radiation within the RCA 8, and it communicates this dosage rate information to the tablet 24, by way of example, which communicates such dosage rate data to the wireless access points 36 for communication to the computer 12. Simultaneously therewith, the wireless access points 36 detect the position of the worker 28 along an x axis 44 and a y axis 48, and potentially along a z axis, within the RCA 8 by detecting the location of the dosimeter 32 and/or the table 24 and/or the glasses 20. As such, when the dose rate that is detected by the dosimeter 32 is stored in a set of dose rate measured data 40, the set of data 40 additionally includes a position within the RCA 8 where each such dose rate was measured, and further includes a time stamp reflective of the time at which such measurement was taken.

It can be seen that FIG. 1 depicts within the RCA 8 a plurality of exemplary locations 52 where dosage rate data was detected and was stored in the set of measured dose rate 40, along with corresponding x, y coordinates and time stamps. The exemplary locations 52 are depicted in FIG. 1 as being in an exemplary grid pattern, but it is understood that the various locations 52 would instead likely be more irregularly positioned within the RCA 8 because they would be taken while the worker 28 moves through the RCA 8 during the course of performing an operation within the RCA 8. That is, the worker 28 likely would enter through an access port 54 into an area where the dosage rate is As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) and will begin performing the tasks that are associated with the operation. The dosimeter 32 may measure dose rates every second, or every fraction of a second, or less frequently, depending upon the needs of the particular application.

As will be set forth in greater detail below, the computer 12 advantageously employs the set of measured dose rate data 40 in order to visually depict on the visual display 16 and/or on the glasses 20 a dosage rate map 55 that includes a first visual object 56 that is representative of the RCA 8 and a number of second visual objects 60 that are representative of the various locations within the RCA 8 and that additionally depict the dosage rate at each such location. The dosage rate map 55 can be visibly depicted on the visual display 16, which may itself be situated outside the RCA 8, and it can additionally or alternatively be depicted on the glasses 20. In this regard, it is understood that the glasses 20 are worn by the worker 28 and include one or more lenses that can serve as additional visual displays upon which the dosage rate map 55 and other indicia can be visually depicted. Since the glasses 20 and the lenses themselves are situated in proximity to the eyes of the worker 28, the worker 28 can readily view the dosage rate map 55 and other visual indicia and data such as will be described in greater detail below without having to separately view another device. That is, while such visual indicia can be output on the tablet 24, by way of example, the outputting of such visual indicia on the glasses 20 facilitates the communication of the visual data to the worker 28 without having to separately look at the tablet 24 in order to see such visual indicia.

Advantageously, the visual display 16 and the glasses 20 can additionally visually depict other indicia that are based upon the detected dosage rates as were detected and recorded in the set of measured dose rate data 40. Even more advantageously, such detected dose rate information in the set of measured dose rate data 40 can be compared with what had been the expected exposure to ionizing radiation, and the difference between the expected values and the actual measured values can be represented on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16. That is, not only can actual numerical data be output, but more simplistic and easily visually understood indicia can be output to facilitate rapid perception and understanding by the worker 28 and/or another person who might be situated outside the RCA 8 and who may be observing the visual display 16.

By way of example, and as is depicted generally in FIG. 2, the computer 12 may include a planner routine 64 that is executable on the processor of the computer 12 and which can employ whatever dosage rate data currently exists, such as from previous operations that may have been performed by other workers inside the RCA and/or from dosimetry surveys that may have been previously conducted inside the RCA. The planner routine 64 would additionally include data regarding the various tasks that must be performed as part of the operation and the path through the RCA 8 that the worker 28 must follow in order to perform the various tasks. The planner routine 64 would additionally include data regarding the tasks themselves, such as the amount of time that typically would be required of the tasks and would additionally include data regarding the level of experience of the worker 28, such as if the worker was a highly experienced individual who had already performed these same tasks in the past or whether the worker is less experienced with such tasks. The planner routine 64 would then determine a profile as a function of the planned dose rate at each of a plurality of times during the operation, and a planned accumulated dose 72 which would be based upon the planned dose rate 68 and the planned time that the user would spend at the various locations within the RCA 8. All of this information would be compared with a radiation dose limit 76 that represents the maximum dose of ionizing radiation to which the worker 28 is permitted to be exposed. Based upon these data, the planner routine 64 can calculate for each time during the operation a planned time left 80 which is calculated by subtracting the planned accumulated dose 72 from the radiation dose limit and dividing it by the planned dose rate 68 that is expected to be experienced by the worker at the corresponding time. An example of such a set of data is depicted generally in FIG. 3. Each row in FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary six minute period during the operation, which is a time period equal to one-tenth of an hour. The planned accumulated dose 72 is calculated by multiplying the planned dose rate 68 by the relevant period of time that the worker 28 is expected to be exposed to that planned dose rate 68, and such values are accumulated over the course of the operation.

Additionally, the dosimeter 32 detects an actual radiation dose rate 84, and such dose rate data and corresponding position data and time stamps as are depicted in FIG. 1 are saved. The actual radiation dose rate 84 is effectively multiplied by the amount of time that the worker 28 experiences such actual radiation dose rate 84, and such exposure is accumulated to determine an accumulated radiation dose 88. The computer 12, having received the actual radiation dose rate 84 can calculate the actual accumulated radiation dose rate 88 and can further calculate from such data an actual time left 92. The actual time left can be calculated by subtracting the radiation dose limit 76 from the actual accumulated radiation dose and dividing the result by the actual radiation dose rate 84 at any given time. It is noted that the planned time left 80 and the actual time left 92 can be output numerically as a period of time which, in FIG. 3, is measured in hours. Again, such period of time can be depicted on an ongoing and constantly updated basis on the glasses 20 or on the visual display 16 or on both. Since the data is numerical in nature, the worker 28 will need to read the digits and mentally process the digits in order to understand the content of the visual output.

By advantageously employing and providing both actual data via the dosimeter 32 and planned data via the planner routine 64, additional useful information can be developed and visually depicted as visual indicia on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16. For example, a variance time left 96 can be calculated by dividing the actual time left by the planned time left and subtracting one therefrom. If the resultant value is greater than 0.1, by way of example, as at 100, a visual indicium 102 such as an upward pointing arrow can be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 to indicate that the variance time left trend at any given moment is favorable. On the other hand, if the value is determined, as at 106, to be less than −0.1, an alternative visual indicium 110 that depicts an exemplary downward pointing arrow could be visually output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 to represent that the variance time left trend is unfavorable. Still alternatively, if the variance time left determined at 96 is neither greater than 0.1 nor less than −0.1, a further alternative indicium 114 can be visually output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 to represent that the variance time left trend is essentially on track.

While the variance time left trend that is determined at 96 is in the nature of a trend rather than an instantaneous value, it is noted that the set of measured dose rate 40 can be further manipulated, as at 118 and 122. More specifically, the variance time left that is determined at 96 can have subtracted therefrom the immediately prior variance time left value to provide more of an instantaneous determination of variance time left. For instance, if the difference between any given variance time left and the immediately preceding variance time left is greater than 0.1, another visual indicium 130 can be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 to indicate that the instantaneous variable time left is favorable by depicting an upward pointing arrow. Alternatively, if the difference is determined at 134 to be less than −0.1, the instantaneous value might result in the outputting of another visual indicium 138 that is represented by a downward pointing arrow, which would suggest that the instantaneous difference is unfavorable, meaning that the variance time left had just become unfavorable. Still alternatively, if it is determined at 134 that the difference determined at 118 and 122 is not less than −0.1, a further visual indicium 142 could be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 in the form of a horizontal arrow which would suggest that the instantaneous value difference is on track.

It is understood that the visual indicia 102, 110, and 114 reflect a trend in the variance time left. In contrast, the visual indicia 130, 138, and 142 are directed more toward an instantaneous value for the variance time left rather than a trend. As such, the instantaneous variance time left 122 and the trend variance 96 can be completely different from one another.

It is also possible to determine, as at 146, a variance trend in the accumulated dose, which is calculated by dividing the actual accumulated radiation dose 88 by the planned accumulated dose 72 and subtracting one therefrom. If the resultant value is determined, as at 150, to be less than −0.1, an additional visual indicium 154 which is depicted as an exemplary upward pointing arrow can be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16, indicating that the variance trend in accumulated dose is favorable. On the other hand, it may be determined, as at 158, that the variance trend accumulated dose is greater than 0.1, in which case an alternative visual indicium 162 can be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16, indicating that the variance trend in accumulated dose 146 is unfavorable. Still alternatively, if it is determined at 158 that the variance trend is not greater than 0.1, a further alternative visual indicium 166 can be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 in the form of an exemplary horizontal arrow, which represents that the variance trend accumulated dose 146 is on track.

It is noted that the variance time left trend indicia 102, 110, and 114 are alternatives of one another and only one of such indicia would be visually output at any given time. Likewise, the visual indicia 130, 138, and 142 are alternatives of one another, and only one of which would be output at any given time. Furthermore, the visual indicia 154, 162, and 166 are alternatives of one another, and only one of which would be output at any given time. It is noted, however, that whichever of the visual indicia 130, 138, and 142 is displayed would be output in addition to whichever of the indicia 102, 110, and 114 is displayed and whichever of the indicia 154, 162, and 166 is displayed. As such, the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 would include one of the indicia 102, 110, and 114 representative of the variance time left trend in addition to one of the indicia 130, 138, and 142 representative of the instantaneous variance time left and one of the indicia 154, 162, and 166 that is representative of the variance trend in accumulated dose.

It thus can be seen that the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 can not only output the planned time left 80 and an actual time left 92, both in numerical form, the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 can additionally include visual depictions of the variance time left trend, the instantaneous variance time left, and the variance trend accumulated dose. The latter three values would be depicted in easily understood forms, such as the aforementioned upward-pointing arrows, downward-pointing arrows, and horizontal arrows, or other such indicia, and may additionally or alternatively include color such as green, red, yellow, and the like to indicate favorable, unfavorable, and on-track values. Other variations will be apparent.

FIG. 4 depicts in diagrammatic form the various data sources that generate data which together are stored as the set of measured dose rate data 40 in the form of a database which can be understood to be approximately in the form of a table 170 that includes a location within the RCA 8 in the form of x, y coordinates, a dose rate designated as “DR” and which is the dose rate that was detected at such location, and a “TIME” value which is the time stamp when the dose rate was detected at such location. The various data values are recorded on a continuous basis, and the system can include a loop to delete duplicate values that might be recorded when the worker 28 is stationary, by way of example.

Not only can the data values and the visual indicia that are depicted in FIG. 2 be visually output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16, the set of measured dose rate data 40 can be employed to generate and output the dosage rate map 55 that is depicted in FIG. 1 as being output on the visual display 16. It is expressly noted that the dosage rate map 55 can additionally or alternatively be output on the glasses 20 for use by the worker 28.

As can be seen in FIG. 1, the first visual object 56 is a schematic depiction of the RCA 8. The second visual objects 60 are positioned with respect to the first visual object 56 in a fashion that represents the arrangement of the various locations within the RCA 8 where the various dosage measurements were recorded. The second visual objects 60 additionally depict the dosage rate that was recorded. In the depicted exemplary embodiment, these dosage rates are depicted by the second visual objects 60 in a numerical fashion, but it is understood that the data could be conveyed in terms of color, and the like to otherwise depict the dosage rate data. The dose rate data may be taken directly from the set of measured dose rate data 40 or it could be averaged in any of a wide variety of fashions or could be otherwise processed. Still alternatively, the values could be normalized if appropriate. Only a representative number of second visual objects 60 are depicted in FIG. 1, and it is understood that probably many more such second visual objects 60 could be output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 as the set of measured dose rate data 40 is developed on an ongoing basis over a period of time.

It is understood that by visually outputting the first and second visual objects 56 and 60 on the visual display 16, a supervisor or technician or other individual could use the dosage rate map 55 to map out an exit path and/or an entrance path for the worker 28 along a path of a minimal dose rates. Moreover, the dosage rate map 55 depicted on the glasses 20 could be observed by the worker 28 and used by the worker 28 to identify a path of reduced dose rate. In this regard, an instantaneous location of the worker 28 potentially could be output as another visual object on the dosage rate map 55 in order to advise the worker 28 where the worker 28 is situated in the RCA 8 at any given time.

It thus can be seen that the system 4 advantageously can output on the glasses 20 and/or the visual display 16 any of a variety of visual indicia, either in a numeric format or a symbolic format, or both, and can additionally visually display the dosage rate map 55 thereon. Such visual outputs assist the worker in determining whether the worker 28 needs to exit the RCA 8 or whether the worker 28 has additional time to complete the various tasks of an operation. Such data output on the visual display 16, which may be situated outside the RCA 8, enables a supervisor or other individual to monitor the progress of the worker 28 and to map out the various tasks that the worker 28 is to perform as well as the specific paths to follow within the RCA 8. By providing the data on a continually updated basis, the worker 28 and other personnel are continually updated regarding the dosage rates and time remaining, as well as the instantaneous and trending aspects of such values, as well as other values. The provision of such data makes the most efficient use of the worker's time within the RCA, thereby saving cost and improving performance. Other benefits will be apparent.

While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular embodiments disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of providing to a worker during an operation wherein the worker is situated within a Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) continually updated information pertaining to the operation, the method comprising: detecting a number of measured dose rates at a number of times during the operation, each measured dose rate of the number of measured dose rates being representative of a rate at which the worker is exposed to ionizing radiation at a corresponding time of the number of times; periodically determining, based at least in part upon the number of measured dose rates, a measured accumulated dose at each time of the number of times that is representative of the accumulated exposure of the worker to ionizing radiation since the beginning of the operation; for each time of the number of times: subtracting the corresponding measured accumulated dose from an allowable maximum dose to determine a corresponding actual available dose that is representative of a corresponding additional accumulation of exposure of the worker to ionizing radiation that is permissible during the operation, and determining, based at least in part upon the corresponding actual available dose and a measured dose rate from among the number of measured dose rates, a corresponding actual time remaining until the worker will have been exposed to the allowable maximum dose; and outputting at one or more times of the number of times on a visual display a visible output that includes indicia which is representative, at least in part, of the actual time remaining.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the corresponding dose rate is employed as the measured dose rate from among the number of measured dose rates.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: generating a number of planned dose rates, each planned dose rate of the number of planned dose rates being representative of a rate at which the worker is predicted to be exposed to ionizing radiation at a corresponding time of the number of times; based at least in part upon the number of planned dose rates, generating for each time of the number of times a corresponding planned accumulated dose that is representative of the exposure to ionizing radiation that the worker is predicted to have accumulated since the beginning of the operation; and outputting at a time from among the one or more times as at least a portion of the visible output a visible indication that is based, at least in part, on a variance between the corresponding measured accumulated dose and the corresponding planned accumulated dose.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising: at each time of the number of times: subtracting the corresponding planned accumulated dose from the allowable maximum dose to determine a corresponding planned available dose that is representative of a planned additional accumulation of exposure of the worker to ionizing radiation that is expected to be permissible during the operation, determining, based at least in part upon the corresponding planned available dose and at least one expected dose rate of the number of expected dose rates, a corresponding expected time remaining until the worker will have been exposed to the allowable maximum dose, and determining a corresponding time variance that is based at least in part upon the corresponding actual time remaining and the corresponding expected time remaining; and outputting at the time as at least a portion of the visible indication a visible notification that is representative, at least in part, of the corresponding time variance.
 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising outputting at the time as at least a portion of the visible notification a visible object that is based at least in part upon a difference between the corresponding time variance and a prior time variance.
 6. The method of claim 3, further comprising: determining at each time of the number of times an accumulated dose variance that is based at least in part upon a variance between the corresponding measured accumulated dose and the corresponding planned accumulated dose; and outputting as at least a portion of the visible indication a visible notification that is representative, at least in part, of the corresponding accumulated dose variance.
 7. The method of claim 3, further comprising: situating a dosimeter in proximity to the worker to enable the dosimeter to move with the worker within the RCA; developing a set of measured dose rate data by, for each time of the number of times: detecting a position of at least one of the dosimeter and the worker within the RCA, and storing the position in association with the corresponding measured dose rate; and visually outputting a dosage rate map that comprises a first visual object that is representative of at least a portion of the RCA and that further comprises a number of second visual objects that are representative of a number of the position within the RCA, at least some of the second visual objects of the number of second visual objects including at least one indicium of a corresponding dose rate that is based at least in part upon the set of measured dose rate data.
 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the number of second visual objects are situated with respect to the first visual object in a fashion that is representative of the arrangement of the number of positions within the RCA and that is based at least in part upon the set of measured dose rate data.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising depicting visible output on a visual display that is situated on the worker and is disposed proximate an eye of the worker. 